Skip to content
Marketing & SEO Medium #quality-score#google-ads

Quality Score Decomposition

Expected CTR + ad relevance + landing page experience. Three signals, one score.

A free, animated quality score decomposition you can read here or embed on any website, from Scrollchart.

Quality Score Decomposition

Quality Score DecompositionThree components, one score: QS 10 can pay half what QS 5 pays for the same position0246810Quality Score (1-10)Account profileQS 3Below avgCPC: 167%QS 6AverageCPC: 100%QS 10Top performerCPC: 60%-40% CPC from QS 3 to QS 10same bid, same positionComponentsExpected CTRAd RelevanceLanding PageCPC discount tableQS 3: pay 167% of baseQS 6: pay 100% (base)QS 10: pay ~60% of baseGoogle Ads published guidanceLanding page experience alone accounts for 30% of QS. Fix page speed before raising bids.

Three account profiles (QS 3, QS 6, QS 10) shown as stacked bars, each divided into its three component contributions: expected CTR (up to 4 points), ad relevance (up to 3 points), and landing page experience (up to 3 points). A bracket annotation shows the 40% CPC reduction between QS 3 and QS 10. A CPC discount table in the right panel maps QS 3 to 167% of base CPC, QS 6 to 100%, and QS 10 to 60%, reinforcing that quality score is an effective bid multiplier. Bottom summary strip calls out landing page experience as the highest-leverage lever.

Good for

  • Quality score improvement guides for Google Ads managers
  • Articles on why landing page experience and page speed directly reduce CPC
  • Bid management primers explaining the second-price auction cost structure

Source & accuracy

This quality score decomposition is an editorial illustration built to represent the concept accurately. Where it shows figures, they are typical or representative values chosen to make the relationship clear, not a single underlying dataset. The diagram and its explainer are reviewed and maintained centrally, and updated over time as understanding improves.

Three independent signals that form your Google Ads grade

Your Google Ads quality score is a 1-10 grade calculated from three equally weighted components. Expected Click-Through Rate measures whether Google's models predict users will click your ad given its position. It's based on historical CTR for your ad and similar ads in similar auctions. Ad Relevance grades how tightly your ad copy matches the search query and the user's intent. It's purely a relevance signal, not a performance signal. Landing Page Experience grades the speed, mobile responsiveness, and relevance alignment between the ad promise and the page content.

Each of the three gets its own below-average, average, or above-average rating. Most quality scores of 5-6 have one or two components at below-average. You're not bad at all three; you're bad at one and mediocre at the others. This is important because it tells you exactly where to focus. If your expected CTR is below average but the other two are average, your problem is ad copy or creative relevance, not page speed or bid structure.

Multiplying efficiency by fixing one component at a time

A keyword with a 5/10 quality score pays roughly 15-20% more for equivalent position than one with 7/10. The difference compounds across thousands of keywords. If your account has 500 keywords averaging 5/10, lifting them to 7/10 means 15-20% lower CPC across the board, which is equivalent to a 15-20% budget increase in terms of clicks and conversions. But you're not increasing budget; you're increasing efficiency.

Attack one component per cycle. If CTR is below average, change your ad copy and creative. Pause for 2-3 weeks while the algorithm recalculates and assigns new signals. If ad relevance is below average, review your keyword list. You might have too many unrelated keywords in one ad group. Split them out and rewrite copy to tighten the match. If landing page experience is below average, audit page speed with Google's Page Speed Insights and mobile usability. Test removing content below the fold to lift the initial viewport experience. Fixing one component often bounces quality score 1-2 points, which is your 15% efficiency gain.

Embed this diagram

Add this animated quality score decomposition to your own site. Copy one line of HTML, or use the embed builder for theme and sizing options.

Reference

What this is
A free, embeddable, animated quality score decomposition for any website.
Who uses it
SaaS marketing blogs, SEO agencies & blogs.
How to embed
Copy one line of HTML. No signup. No watermark. Works in WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Substack, plain HTML.
File size
iframe embed, ~80 KB gzipped (loads on demand, does not block your page paint).
License
Free forever. Editorial explainer text included; updated centrally over time.

Embed format options

Copy the universal HTML snippet, the WordPress shortcode, or an iframe fallback - see the WordPress plugin page for details. Any format keeps the same Core Web Vitals profile and the same explainer text.

Embed snippet
<div data-scrollchart="quality-score-decomposition" data-scrollchart-v="1"></div>
<script src="https://scrollchart.com/embed.js" async></script>

Frequently asked questions

Where can I get a free animated "Quality Score Decomposition" for my website?
Scrollchart provides "Quality Score Decomposition" as a free, embeddable animated diagram you can add to any website with one line of HTML. No signup is required and there is no watermark. The diagram and its explainer text are served from scrollchart.com, so the embed stays current without any maintenance on your end.
How do I embed a quality score decomposition in WordPress or a static site?
Paste the HTML snippet from the Scrollchart diagram page into your WordPress post (in HTML/code view), your Webflow embed block, or directly into a static HTML file. No plugin is needed. The diagram loads from scrollchart.com and paints in as the reader scrolls.