Three architectures for price stability
Fiat-collateralized stablecoins (USDC, USDT) hold reserves in a bank, with 1:1 backing. An issuer accepts deposits of fiat currency and mints tokens equivalent to the reserve. This model is the simplest and most trusted but requires institutional custody. Crypto-collateralized stablecoins (DAI) require borrowers to post crypto collateral worth more than the loan in the stablecoin. Smart contracts maintain the peg through overcollateralization and liquidation mechanics. Algorithmic stablecoins rely on mint and burn incentives without explicit collateral, using arbitrage to restore the peg when it drifts.
Peg maintenance and failure modes
Fiat-collateralized stables rarely lose peg because redemptions are guaranteed by the issuer. Crypto-collateralized stables can experience peg failures if collateral values fall faster than liquidations can occur. Algorithmic stables are the most fragile, requiring sustained demand for the mechanism to function. The 2023 UST collapse demonstrated that peg failure in algorithmic designs can be complete and irreversible.